文学城论坛
+A-

小车不安全,IIHS用Accord撞Fit,Camry对撞Yaris,奔驰C撞Smart (图)

8年驾龄 2009-04-14 16:37:10 ( reads)



小车不安全,IIHS用Accord撞Fit,Camry对撞Yaris,奔驰C撞Smart “The small cars involved in all three tests - the Toyota Yaris, Honda Fit and Smart ForTwo - had already earned top scores for front impact protection in the Institute's standard front impact test in which cars are crashed into a crushable barrier, not another car. ” “That test simulates two cars of roughly equal size hitting almost head-on.” 就是大车安全,小车不安全。IIHS要救美国车了????可惜俺没找到大图,过几天再看吧。 原文链接:http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/14/autos/iihs_small_vs_big/index.htm?postversion=2009041404 http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_33717.aspx

跟帖(45)

1800800

2009-04-14 17:07:00

真理重复一万遍还是真理。

coorslight969

2009-04-14 17:08:37

重复一万遍,什么都是真理

1800800

2009-04-14 17:16:33

真的。。。?

internuts

2009-04-14 19:20:11

说到30遍的时候,别人就会说 “这人病的不轻了

Audi

2009-04-15 10:21:59

Audi is here !!!!!

1800800

2009-04-15 16:32:54

还真好使。下次我也对着我的车嚷几嗓子:PORSCHE,PORSCHE,PORSCHE!

Audi

2009-04-16 13:35:59

Sorry, still Audi...

wer188

2009-04-14 17:16:38

重复一万遍, 没人还在乎真理

bassman

2009-04-14 17:13:51

how about Camery vs. Buick or Accord vs. Cadillac?

北航新保理英子

2009-04-14 18:30:47

不明白, 造大车难吗?好像比容易小车。一切取决与生意。

北航新保理英子

2009-04-14 18:43:19

话又说回来, 任何时候都有大小车, 除非都开一款车

MOVEOVER

2009-04-14 20:55:15

应该对超过4米长的车征“威胁他人安全”特别税

Grant

2009-04-14 21:55:52

那就没人买车,看肥了谁。

internuts

2009-04-14 22:03:35

嗯,再对少于3米的征收有碍观瞻费。。。国家大发了~~

cys254

2009-04-14 20:56:54

No car is safe

我来自火星

2009-04-14 21:52:15

装甲车,蝙蝠侠的车,应该可以保证安全了在一般路况

woth

2009-04-15 11:50:38

是,关键还是要看开车的人

ISO

2009-04-15 10:12:42

Accord 和 Camry 也有欺负被人的机会了,不容易。hehe

once4all09

2009-04-15 11:15:13

It's not the size of the car, stupid!

-vip-

2009-04-15 11:32:50

经济不景气,大街上有几个是开超豪华车的?举那些特例干什么?

once4all09

2009-04-15 11:38:23

回经济不景气doesn't make your gas guzzler safer

-vip-

2009-04-15 11:46:11

你以为你做的那些“研究”比LZ的照片更说明问题吗?

once4all09

2009-04-15 12:02:16

What is a "referred journal"??? Lol!

once4all09

2009-04-15 12:04:57

Of course not, the pics appeal to people like urself

-vip-

2009-04-15 13:06:43

打错了。refereed

woth

2009-04-15 11:52:04

汽车的安全性能不是只靠一个迎头对撞就能测试出来的,要有很多

Audi

2009-04-15 12:05:01

But "一个迎头对撞" says everything if you are

once4all09

2009-04-15 12:15:40

It is not rocket science

Audi

2009-04-15 12:25:00

Then give me an example which a much smaller car

once4all09

2009-04-15 12:32:07

Again, what is more import to you, your car or the life of you a

Audi

2009-04-15 12:37:57

又一个“吸能大师”来了!Life for sure...but do you

once4all09

2009-04-15 12:43:45

You don't know why THESE 3 smallish cars were picked

Audi

2009-04-15 12:47:44

I tend to agree on this: smaller cheaper cars are

once4all09

2009-04-15 12:56:34

回复:I tend to agree on this: smaller cheaper cars are

Audi

2009-04-15 13:11:59

It is called Statistics. Well, sorry too much for ur IQ!

Audi

2009-04-15 12:43:58

Look at this carefully, stupid! "In the case of

once4all09

2009-04-15 12:51:10

Let's just leave it at that

Audi

2009-04-15 12:53:31

Yes, yours are unfortunately too low!

Audi

2009-04-15 12:56:46

BTW, do you really know what does "it's not rocket

once4all09

2009-04-15 13:01:45

回复:汽车的安全性能不是只靠一个迎头对撞就能测试出来的,要有很多

Audi

2009-04-15 13:08:01

True!

Audi

2009-04-15 13:09:05

Hey, it's not rocket science either.

Audi

2009-04-15 13:18:30

let me just ask you: In those cases, in which cars

sideshowbob

2009-04-22 01:38:20

这个图片是OFFSET碰撞,大车被撞的部分刚好是另一边,只能

jgsaron

2009-04-22 14:17:04

Audi and once4a1109