文学城论坛
+A-

大家不要用Chrome了,Google有权把所有你的信息收走! (图)

Π 2008-09-08 18:59:58 ( reads)

So, are you enjoying the snappy, clean performance of Google Chrome since downloading yesterday? If so, you might want to take a closer peek at the end user license agreement you didn't pay any attention to when downloading and installing it. Because according to what you agreed to, Google owns everything you publish and create while using Chrome. Ah-whaaa? Update: It was a copy & paste mistake, apparently, and the offending language is being removed as we speak. Thanks, Googe! Here are the juicy bits in question: 11. Content license from you 11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services. 11.2 You agree that this license includes a right for Google to make such Content available to other companies, organizations or individuals with whom Google has relationships for the provision of syndicated services, and to use such Content in connection with the provision of those services. 11.3 You understand that Google, in performing the required technical steps to provide the Services to our users, may (a) transmit or distribute your Content over various public networks and in various media; and (b) make such changes to your Content as are necessary to conform and adapt that Content to the technical requirements of connecting networks, devices, services or media. You agree that this license shall permit Google to take these actions. 11.4 You confirm and warrant to Google that you have all the rights, power and authority necessary to grant the above license. Well, I guess I shouldn't have used Chrome to put some posts up yesterday, because I certainly do not have the rights, power or authority to hand over my work from Gawker to the Googe. Oops! You'll have to pry the rights to my posts from Nick Denton's cold, dead hands, Google. In any case, it's a pretty unnecessary and unreasonable thing to put in the EULA for a browser, of all pieces of software, which makes it pretty questionable. Why in the hell would Google want ownership of every single blog post or email written in its browser? It's so unreasonable that it borders on the insane. I can't really imagine Google actually invoking this and suddenly publishing heavily edited entries from your LiveJournal for profit, but I think a lot of people would feel much better about hopping on board with Chrome if this little piece of sketchy legalese was axed. What say you, Google overlords?

跟帖(5)

Π

2008-09-08 18:58:59

不仅不好用,还这么霸道,我是坚决不用Chrome了,就是

wireonfire

2008-09-08 19:09:19

google已经修改了,不要误导群众。

Π

2008-09-08 19:13:19

是嘛?只是说会改,已经改好了么?我找不到链接?你能提供?

Π

2008-09-08 19:31:53

不过不管怎样,我都不会再相信google出品了,谷歌的所有

SunOfBeach

2008-09-08 21:26:58

的确, GMAIL我只是用来收广告的.