文学城论坛
+A-

检方给的不起诉第一条理由、且是唯一提到的细节:在应召上门的警察眼皮下,女子用汉语要求与刘私下谈话

kankantw 2018-12-23 08:58:09 ( reads)

警察随身的摄像机录下了该女子与刘的普通话交谈,事发当天凌晨(8月31日 1-2am)警察送刘回宾馆前,该女子要求与刘私下谈话。

根据检察官发布的新闻消息:8月31日的凌晨刘强东在女事主的家中,当时她的一个朋友(同学)打电话给警察,警察到达女事主的家中、并与刘和女事主两人对过话,根据与该女子的通话信息,结束通话后警察将刘送(took)回了他住的旅馆。当天晚上刘在明州大学被拘留。

虽然事前有朋友报警,应召的警察当时并没有拘留刘强东,说明女事主没有当场说有“强奸”,然后警察还将刘送回了他住的旅馆。最为关键的是:在警察和刘一起离开前,女事主用普通话要求与刘强东私下谈话。这段对话是警察随身的摄像机录下的,因为是汉语,一直没有引起警察的注意,是检察官详细审查证据时才发现,列为了不起诉的第一条理由。

其他的证据,例如外部的摄像,旁人的证言,这些室外的证据都可以否认掉,只要抓住底线就可以了:室内发生了强暴。甚至是当警察面说“是误会”(正如不少爆料新闻中报道的那样)也可以推脱说:担心刘的“钱势”能吃案和报复,因此不想提告,唯独这个女子在第一时间主动“要求私下谈话”很难自圆其说,这条证据是检察官提到的唯一一个具体细节。以往的爆料新闻中常常看到:是刘强东主动要求私下协商和解,这下证明是恰恰相反了。有了这个证据,可以合理地怀疑这名女子最开始就是冲着钱去的。

我在这里列出明州 Hennepin County 检察官的新闻申明的原文链接 www.hennepinattorney.org/news/news/2018/December/Liu-Qiangdong-nocharges ,全文 可以从检察官的网站上查到(2018年12月的新闻) :www.hennepinattorney.org/news/news 。部分原文如下:

... it was determined there were profound evidentiary problems which would have made it highly unlikely that any criminal charge could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

... in the early morning of Aug. 31, a fellow student and friend of the woman’s, called the police. Officers arrived at the woman’s apartment where they spoke to her and to Liu. Based on the information they learned from the woman that night, officers ended the call and took Liu back to his hotel. Liu was arrested later that day at the University of Minnesota.

During the review of the evidence by the prosecutors, which consisted of three men and one woman, it was discovered that portions of the evidence included conversations and messages in Mandarin that were translated to English. That evidence included video from a body camera worn by the officers that captured conversations between Liu and the woman inside her apartment, and later, portions of the conversation between the two of them after the woman asked to speak privately with Liu before he was transported back to his hotel.

The substance of those conversations, along with all of the other evidence including statements from the woman and others, as well as footage from multiple surveillance cameras, do not support criminal charges in this case.

...

 

跟帖(0)