The comments suggest a belief in the Masonic organization (referred to as 共濟會 or "Gong Ji Hui") playing a significant role in the creation of Chinese civilizations, attributing the establishment of various cultures and achievements to this group.
Comparison with Song Dynasty:
The comments draw parallels between modern Taiwan, Korea, and Hong Kong to the Song Dynasty in ancient China. They highlight a focus on education, a disdain for military service, and a perceived decline in martial spirit.
Historical Reflection on the Song Dynasty:
There is a reflection on the Song Dynasty as a period similar to contemporary China, emphasizing similarities in governance, societal attitudes, and geopolitical challenges.
Critique of Song Dynasty's Overconfidence:
The comments criticize the Song Dynasty's overconfidence and reluctance to recognize the strength of neighboring nations. This overconfidence is linked to diplomatic failures and a lack of preparation against external threats.
Analysis of External and Internal Factors:
The comment provides an analysis of external factors, like climate, impacting the Song Dynasty's interactions with neighboring nations. Internally, there's a critique of a focus on cultural development at the expense of military strength.
Historical Lessons for Modern China:
The comments caution against repeating historical mistakes, drawing parallels between historical events and current Chinese policies, especially in terms of technological developments, foreign relations, and the treatment of the common people.
Reflection on Han and Tang Dynasties:
There is a positive reflection on the inclusivity and self-confidence of the Han and Tang Dynasties, contrasting it with the perceived shortcomings of the Song Dynasty.
Comparison with Contemporary China:
A connection is made between the historical practices of the Song Dynasty and what is perceived as modern issues in China, such as a lack of adaptability, problems arising from reforms, and a gap between government actions and public sentiments.
Quoting Historical Texts:
The comments conclude with a quote from Wang Anshi's "本朝百年无事札" (Notes on a Century of Peace in the Present Dynasty), implying that the absence of major conflicts in ancient times was due to favorable conditions rather than exceptional governance.
These extrapolated points provide an overview of the themes and opinions expressed in the original Chinese comments, offering insights into historical perspectives and their perceived relevance to contemporary issues.
in English: extrapolate points of the below: "@richardmylau8225 @richardmylau8225 1 year ago (edited) 共濟會創造了中華文明,共濟會有虞氏建立了良渚文化,共濟會東夷創造了龍山文化,光明會武丁時代,光明會共濟會同盟建立中國第一個文明。所以共濟會趙姓統治的宋朝是中華文明全盛時代,共濟會除了推動文化發展外,亦推動經濟發展,宋朝亦是經濟繁榮時代。不過宋朝最偉大發明是大角星姓氏畢昇發明的活字印刷,宋朝最偉大詞人是大角星姓氏柳永和蘇軾,清明上河圖是由大角星姓氏張擇端所作,唐宋八大家由唐朝時大角星姓氏韓愈和柳宗元開始,共濟會雖然推動經濟文化發展,但頂尖文化科技來自大角星。宋太祖是贵族出身,中国历史文化从宋朝开始落后,和开创祖师和开放的政治有很大关系。 元朝是草原酋长出身,明朝是农民出身,清朝是东北酋长出身,至于我朝,,,自己体会。
10 Reply 7 replies @enzol2823 @enzol2823 1 year ago 近代台灣,韓國香港,新加坡都已經步入宋朝的翻版。 奉行萬般皆下品,唯有讀書高的思想,生活水準高,人民失去開創獨立精神,體弱多病,毫無尚武精神。教育不知文武雙全的重要。 鄙視當兵,鄙視技藝工匠等,鄙視那些只會活燿於體育場上的人。 反觀那些弱不禁風的偶像明星,被當成神! 中國呢?!恭喜老爺賀喜夫人,中國也開始宋朝化了,很快就會追上來的。元蒙那么厉害,那么近那么弱的印度都拿不下。无它,败给了气候而已。霍去病卫青武勇强悍也没能解决掉北方匈奴之患,结果一场天灾就把匈奴彻底打击了。
2 Reply 3 replies @tianchengli3193 @tianchengli3193 1 year ago 前事不忘后事之师。