思想意识是波或波的组合 SeetoMD

Kwseeto (2023-08-03 14:03:34) 评论 (4)


 

意识是波或波的组合,我的假没。 SeetoMD 司徒

 

当一切都消失了,当地球、星星、月亮、太阳、星系都消失了,宇宙还会记得我们吗?我当神经内科医生已经 30 年了。有一个疑问一直存在于我的脑海中。什么是意识 ?为什么我们有想法? 例如我们看到的橙子是黄色的,味道是甜甜的 ,它为什么有质感,有味道? 如果我们打开大脑,你看不到橙子 的样子在脑里面,你没有闻到橙子的味道。为什么我们会有这样的感觉?似乎纯粹是幻觉? 但又如此真实。

 

以前,我们认为人的所有思想和活动都在大脑里,被颅骨包围内,如此坚固。如果我们复制一个三维空间的大脑,如果我们有能力用材料复制一个大脑,和它的血管,神经,神经元,神经胶质,所有的东西我们都复制了,能产生思想意识吗?到目前为止还没人做过,不过估计以后可以测试一下。过去有一个物理学的概念。如果我们知道最大物体和那些最小的粒子就像电子、质子、夸克子等等,最小的粒子排列在它们的三维空间,你可以计算亿万年前过去,你也可以预测它的亿万年将来。物理学家曾说所有的信息在星星、月亮、地球、太阳消失后,都会落入黑洞而灰飞烟灭。但近来有物理学家说所有这些信息都不会消失,它们会存留在黑洞的边缘,所以如果将来有一天,人们可以随意找到并返回那些信息,他们可以查字典找到它。人们可以重复所有过去活动并预测未来。这不是幻想。有人会问我们是否有自由意志。我们可以有自由意志吗?量子学说那些颗粒可以同时有50%的概率在一个地方,50%的概率在另一个地方。如果你用杯子喝水,那水就100%在你口里,似乎这就是自由意志,所以我认为我们人类的意识不会消失。无论如何,我们和我们的文明(思想、著作、音乐、爱情)都会留在我们的宇宙里。即使这个宇宙终结了,也会留在宇宙之外。我认为意识思想可以以波的形式存在,是-个物质,由粒子以不同的形式组合形成,可以出入颅骨,就像软件一样可以在大脑这个硬件上表达出来。如果这个概念可以成位,意识也可以不依靠大脑而存在。这仅是我的假设,希望没有违反现知的科学定律。

评论 (4)

Q22

挺好的文章,有趣的话题。很多哲学宗教一类都涉及这个话题。难以说明白,难以完全信,又不得不信一部分至少。

人类起源于一个灵魂。上帝即宇宙意识。先有意识,再有物质。精神大于物质。 先说这些吧。

Kwseeto

consciousness wave defined by SeetoMD: a wave formed by pro-consciousness particles in such way that it can pass through skull, acting as a software on Brain ( hardware ) to manifest thought, identity, personality, conscience and all cognitive function.

SeetoMD定义的意识波:由前意识粒子形成的波,可以穿过头骨,作为大脑(硬件)上的软件来体现思想、身份、个性、良心和所有认知功能

Kwseeto

Let me call it “consciousness wave” 意识波

Kwseeto

Consciousness is a wave or a combination of waves, my claim SeetoMD

When everything disappears, when the earth, stars, moon, sun, and galaxies disappear, will the universe still remember us? I have been a neurologist for 30 years. There is a question that has always been in my mind. What is consciousness? Why do we have ideas? For example, the orange we see is yellow and tastes sweet. Why does it have texture and taste? If we open the brain, you can't see the shape of the orange in the brain, you don't smell the orange. Why do we feel this way? Seems like pure hallucination? But so true.

In the past, we thought that all human thoughts and mental activities were in the brain, surrounded by the skull, so solid. If we copy a three-dimensional brain, if we have the ability to use materials to copy a brain, and its blood vessels, nerves, neurons, glia, and everything else, can we produce thought ideology or consciousness? No one has done it so far, but it is estimated that it can be tested in the future. There used to be a concept of physics. If we know that the largest objects and those smallest particles are like electrons, protons, quarks, etc., and the smallest particles are arranged in their three-dimensional space, you can calculate the past billions of years, and you can also predict its future billions of years . Physicist once said that all information will fall into black holes and be wiped out after the disappearance of stars, moon, earth and sun. But recently some physicists have said that all this information is not going to disappear, it will remain on the edge of the black hole, so if one day in the future, people can find and return that information at will, they can look it up in the dictionary. One can repeat all past activities and predict the future. This is not fantasy. Some people will ask whether we have free will. Can we have free will? Quantum theory says that those particles can be in one place 50% of the time and in another place 50% of the time at the same time. If you drink water from a cup, the water is 100% in your mouth, it seems that this is free will. I don't think our human consciousness will disappear. No matter what, we and our civilization (thoughts, writings, music, love) will remain in our universe. Even if this universe ends, it will remain outside this universe. I think that consciousness can exist in the form of waves, which are formed by combining particles in different forms, which can enter and exit the skull, and act as software that express on the the brain ( hardware)。If this concept makes sense, consciousness can also exist without relying on the brain. This is just my hypothesis, I hope it doesn't violate the known laws of science.