文学城论坛
+A-

有这么回事吗?这与他们发表的文章有矛盾。

吃与活 2016-12-05 10:46:41 ( reads)
 
1998 Nov 21;317(7170):1411-22.

Emerging tobacco hazards in China: 1. Retrospective proportional mortality study of one million deaths.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the hazards at an early phase of the growing epidemic of deaths from tobacco in China.

DESIGN:

Smoking habits before 1980 (obtained from family or other informants) of 0.7 million adults who had died of neoplastic, respiratory, or vascular causes were compared with those of a reference group of 0.2 million who had died of other causes.

SETTING:

24 urban and 74 rural areas of China.

SUBJECTS:

One million people who had died during 1986-8 and whose families could be interviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Tobacco attributable mortality in middle or old age from neoplastic, respiratory, or vascular disease.

RESULTS:

Among male smokers aged 35-69 there was a 51% (SE 2) excess of neoplastic deaths, a 31% (2) excess of respiratory deaths, and a 15% (2) excess of vascular deaths. All three excesses were significant (P<0.0001). Among male smokers aged >/70 there was a 39% (3) excess of neoplastic deaths, a 54% (2) excess of respiratory deaths, and a 6% (2) excess of vascular deaths. Fewer women smoked, but those who did had tobacco attributable risks of lung cancer and respiratory disease about the same as men. For both sexes, the lung cancer rates at ages 35-69 were about three times as great in smokers as in non-smokers, but because the rates among non-smokers in different parts of China varied widely the absolute excesses of lung cancer in smokers also varied. Of all deaths attributed to tobacco, 45% were due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 15% to lung cancer; oesophageal cancer, stomach cancer, liver cancer, tuberculosis, stroke, and ischaemic heart disease each caused 5-8%. Tobacco caused about 0.6 million Chinese deaths in 1990 (0.5 million men). This will rise to 0.8 million in 2000 (0.4 million at ages 35-69) or to more if the tobacco attributed fractions increase.

CONCLUSIONS:

At current age specific death rates in smokers and non-smokers one in four smokers would be killed by tobacco, but as the epidemic grows this proportion will roughly double. If current smoking uptake rates persist in China (where about two thirds of men but few women become smokers) tobacco will kill about 100 million of the 0.3 billion males now aged 0-29, with half these deaths in middle age and half in old age.

PMID:
9822393
PMCID:
PMC28719

跟帖(8)

吃与活

2016-12-05 10:58:23

看到了Campbell的解释

虎嗅蔷薇

2016-12-05 11:50:13

我就是在猜测旱烟和香烟也许在致癌作用上有相当大的不同。我上面说的二者负相关是单指旱烟

吃与活

2016-12-05 13:15:20

谢谢,同意。

虎嗅蔷薇

2016-12-05 12:53:19

他把肺癌归类到富贵病,他这段话是不是在说,吸烟本身不是导致肺癌的第一因素,而富裕生活方式才是?我这么理解他的话对不对?

吃与活

2016-12-05 13:19:49

我也是这样理解他的解读,但这样的认识是不是有道理我也不知道。一个解释可以是烟草诱癌,但乡下人的生活方式使癌得不到发展壮大。

虎嗅蔷薇

2016-12-05 13:48:00

这个不就是坎贝尔的中心思想:

吃与活

2016-12-05 14:03:31

坎贝尔有点倔强 ;)

虎嗅蔷薇

2016-12-05 22:09:58

是有点牵强。那个负相关是China Study里成千上万个关联之一,说不定就是个anomaly,没啥意义的一个factoid而已